Overdose in politics

We are experiencing hot political debates on the subject of the Ensar Foundation and the sexual abuse of children. Of course, the entire Ensar Foundation cannot be blamed, but it is now certain that an order or regulation to oversee the foundation dormitory buildings must be created. 

On the other hand, we have been engaged in such political fights that concrete issues like "control" have been eroded.

First, let me say that I totally agree with Mrs. Fatma ?ahin's words, a former family minister and a rational politician: "Unfortunately, in our country, the style seems to dominate over the essence. I think Family Minister Sema Ramazano?lu could not express it initially, then later she was able to explain what she meant.

Just as [main opposition leader Kemal] K?l?çdaro?lu was saying, about that sentence, that he did not mean that, the minister also did not mean that. In this case, I think we have experienced a communication accident?"

We have turned a communication accident into a huge political fight. This is because the sides were prioritizing politics.  

In a mature political culture, before a political fight, the stance of "focusing on the problem" would be adopted: What kind of measures should be taken against the increase in child abuse cases in general?

Specifically, what is the legal status of the foundations and associations that own and manage student dormitories? What should they be? What are the shortcomings in the control mechanism? 

No, we did not discuss these issues. Because of political fights, we were not able to deal with the "control" issue.   

Well, as a matter of fact, "to be audited, to be controlled" is not our thing. When we talk about democracy, we think of being elected,...