Appeals court presses Trump administration on travel ban

U.S. President Donald Trump's order temporarily banning U.S. entry to people from seven Muslim-majority countries came under intense scrutiny on Feb. 7 from a federal appeals court that questioned whether the ban unfairly targeted people over their religion. 

During a more than hour-long oral argument, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals pressed a government lawyer whether the Trump administration's national security argument was backed by evidence that people from the seven countries posed a danger. 

Judge Richard Clifton, a George W. Bush appointee, posed equally tough questions for an attorney representing Minnesota and Washington states, which are challenging the ban. Clifton asked if a Seattle judge's suspension of Trump's policy was "overbroad." 

The 9th Circuit said at the end of the session it would issue a ruling as soon as possible. Earlier on Feb. 7, the court said it would likely rule this week but would not issue a same-day ruling. The matter will ultimately likely go to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Trump's Jan. 27 order barred travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days, except refugees from Syria, whom he would ban indefinitely. 

Trump, who took office on Jan. 20, has defended the measure, the most divisive act of his young presidency, as necessary for national security. 

Trump tweeted on Feb. 8 that if he loses the pending court case over his travel ban, the country "can never have the security and safety to which we are entitled."

The order sparked protests and chaos at U.S. and overseas airports. Opponents also assailed it as discriminatory against Muslims in violation of the U.S....