Top UN court rejects Balkan genocide claims

From left: Serbian Justice Minister Nikola Selkovic, ambassador Petar Vico and Sasa Obradovic of the delegation of Serbia sit on February 3, 2015 in the courtroom of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. AFP Photo

The UN's highest court on Feb. 3 rejected rival claims of genocide by former foes Croatia and Serbia in landmark rulings over the bloody Balkans wars of the 1990s.

International Court of Justice chief judge Peter Tomka dismissed Zagreb's claim that Serb forces committed genocide during Croatia's war of independence.
      
He made a similar ruling in a counter-claim by Belgrade over a Croatian counter-offensive that forced 200,000 Serbs to flee after the last major battle of the 1991-1995 war.
      
The case had been described by Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic as perhaps one of the "most important events" determining his country's relations with Croatia.
      
Zagreb dragged Belgrade before the ICJ in 1999 on genocide charges linked to the war in Croatia during the bloody breakup of the former Yugoslavia.
      
Serbia was accused of ethnic cleansing as a "form of genocide" in the town of Vukovar and other areas, leading to large numbers of Croats being displaced, killed or tortured and their property destroyed.
      
About 20,000 people died in the conflict, one of several bloody wars that shook the Balkans in the 1990s.
      
Vukovar was captured after a three-month-long attack by the Yugoslav army (JNA) and Serb rebels.
      
After its fall, about 22,000 non-Serbs were expelled, and about 350 people from the Vukovar region are still reported missing.
      
Zagreb had wanted the ICJ judges to order Belgrade to pay compensation.
      
Belgrade responded with a counter-suit in 2010, saying about 200,000 ethnic Serbs were forced to flee when Croatia launched a military operation to retake its territory in 1995.
      
Following Zagreb's counter-offensive,...

Continue reading on: