What about the muezzin's lifestyle?

Mehmet Kuzgun, the muezzin of İzmir's Narlıdere Yalvaç Mosque was assaulted after he recited the "sala" (a special call to prayer) on the night of July 15. The release of his attackers pending trial drew an angry reaction from members of the public and a renewed detention order was issued. 

Some are calling on those who condemned the release of the man who physically assaulted a nurse on a public bus to also speak out over the release of the attackers of the muezzin.

Are they not right? 

I also protested when the attacker of nurse Ayşegül Terzi, who assaulted her for wearing a skirt, was initially released. He was arrested again when the nature of the accusation changed. He is now being tried for "deliberate injury" and also for "interfering into someone's lifestyle," which was introduced to the Penal Code in 2014. 

Can the same clause be applied to the case of the assaulted muezzin, who was attacked because he recited the sala? The attackers are charged with "attempting to change the constitutional order," "deliberate injury" and "insult." 

The incident was recorded by the security camera of the mosque. Three people, one of them a man, approached the muezzin in front of the mosque and started arguing with him. A woman broke the glass at the entrance with a stone. Then she attacked the muezzin. 

Will this only be considered as a case of preventing the muezzin from doing his job? Will it simply be considered deliberate injury and insult to a civil servant? Or should be moved further, considering whether the attack was motivated by support for the coup attempt? Or should it be considered interference in the lifestyle of the muezzin because of his faith? 

If you ask me, my answer would be "Yes, the attack on...